Objective To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer. Methods The databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCT) or clinical controlled trials (CCT) comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer published from January 1991 to May 2019. Chinese search terms included "colorectum/colon/rectum" , "cancer/malignant tumor" , "laparoscopy" , "metastasis" , " IV" ; English search terms included "laparoscop*" , "colo*" , "rect*" , "cancer/tumor/carcinoma/neoplasm" , " IV" , "metasta*" . Inclusion criteria (1) RCT or CCT, with or without allocation concealment or blinding; (2) patients with stage IV colorectal cancer that was diagnosed preoperatively and would receive resection of the primary tumor; (3) the primary tumor that was palliativelyon of the primary tumor is safe and feasible to enhance recovery after surgery by promoting postoperative bowel function recovery, shortening hospital stay and reducing postoperative complication in stage IV colorectal cancer.Objective To investigate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM). Methods A descriptive case series study was performed. Clinicopathological data of patients with SCRLM who underwent laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases in Zhongshan Hospital between December 2015 and September 2018 were retrieved from a prospective colorectal cancer database. Perioperative presentations and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 53 patients were enrolled with average age of(61.7±11.3) years. Among them, 32 were male (60.4%) and 21 were female (39.6%). Twenty-five patients (47.2%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and 28 (52.8%) were grade II. All the patients completed laparoscopic simultaneous resection without conversion. The average operation time was (320.2±114.5) min. The estimated blood loss was d grade III to IV complications which were improved by conservative treatment. The median follow-up period was 23.2 months. During follow-up, 19 patients (35.8%) developed recurrence or metastasis, and 4 (7.5%) died. The 1- and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 68% and 47% respectively, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 95% and 86% respectively. Conclusions Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases is safe and feasible in selected patients with SCRLM. Postoperative intestinal function recovery is enhanced, and morbidity and oncological outcomes are acceptable.Objective To understand the current practice of preoperative bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery in China. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted through wechat. The content of the questionnaire survey included professional title of the participants, the hospital class, dietary preparation and protocol, oral laxatives and specific types, oral antibiotics, gastric intubation, and mechanical enema before elective colorectal surgery. A stratified analysis based on hospital class was conducted to understand their current practice of preoperative bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery. Result A total of 600 questionnaires were issued, and 516 (86.00%) questionnaires of participants from different hospitals, engaged in colorectal surgery or general surgeons were recovered, of which 366 were from tertiary hospitals (70.93%) and 150 from secondary hospitals (29.07%). For diet preparation, the proportions of right hemicolic, left hemicolic and rectal surgery were 81.59% (42 the secondary hospitals accounted for higher proportions in diet preparation [87.33% (131/150) vs. 76.78% (281/366), χ(2)=7.369, P=0.007], gastric intubation [54.00% (81/150) vs. 36.33% (133/366), χ(2)=13.672, P less then 0.001], preoperative oral antibiotics [58.67% (88/150) vs. 24.86% (91/366), χ(2)=12.259, P less then 0.001] and enema [28.67% (43/150) vs. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/mivebresib-abbv-075.html 15.30% (56/366), χ(2)=53.661, P less then 0.001]. Conclusion Although the preoperative bowel preparation practice in elective colorectal surgery for most of surgeons in China is basically the same as the current international protocol, the proportions of mechanical enema and gastric intubation before surgery are still relatively high.Objective To explore the feasibility of using faster regional convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) to evaluate the status of circumferential resection margin (CRM) of rectal cancer in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-1800017410). Case inclusion criteria (1) the positive area of CRM was located between the plane of the levator ani, anal canal and peritoneal reflection; (2) rectal malignancy was confirmed by electronic colonoscopy and histopathological examination; (3) positive CRM was confirmed by postoperative pathology or preoperative high-resolution MRI. Exclusion criteria patients after neoadjuvant therapy, recurrent cancer after surgery, poor quality images, giant tumor with extensive necrosis and tissue degeneration, and rectal tissue construction changes in previous pelvic surgery. According to the above criteria, MRI plain scan images of 350 patients with rectal cancer and positive CRM in The Affiliated Hospita artificial intelligence approach were 0.884, 0.857, 0.898, 0.807, and 0.926, respectively; the AUC was 0.934 (95% CI 91.3% to 95.4%). The Faster R-CNN model's automatic recognition time for a single image was 0.2 s. Conclusion The artificial intelligence model based on Faster R-CNN for the identification and segmentation of CRM-positive MRI images of rectal cancer is established, which can complete the risk assessment of CRM-positive areas caused by in-situ tumor invasion and has the application value of preliminary screening.